Subscribe to our newsletter
An Overleaf Case Study: Brown University seeks insight into research collaboration
Andrew Creamer
Librarian & Scientific Data Management Specialist
About Brown University
- Located in historic Providence, Rhode Island and founded in 1764, Brown University is the seventh oldest college in the United States.
Goals
- Allow the library to provide improved service to faculty and students.
Approach
- Provide tools for new forms of scholarly communication that bring efficiency to the collaborative writing process.
- Get analytics data on content that is relevant to faculty members and students.
Results
- The library gets the insight and information it needs
- The students and faculty get a great tool for writing and collaborating
- The University gets an easy submission portal for its institutional repository
Brown University is engaged in a pilot project to investigate how its library can support scholarly communication. As part of the pilot it is using Overleaf as an authoring and submission tool, which will enable researchers to publish articles directly into the institutional repository.
Andrew Creamer is a librarian in Brown’s Center for Digital Scholarship. He works in close liaison with the Computer Science department, helping faculty members to write data management and data sharing plans for sponsored research. He also promotes the use of Brown’s institutional repository to the department.
Close Engagement
When he first started at Brown in April 2014, the Chair of the Computer Science department was keen to use a cloud-based LaTeX editor, and Andrew saw in this an opportunity to address how the library could offer better support to the department beyond collections delivery.
Earlier in his own career, Andrew worked on a team funded by a grant from the National Library of Medicine to develop data management roles for librarians:
“I wanted to broaden our relevance,” he says. “If we could find out how the computer science department works as a unique community, how authors write their papers and with whom they collaborate, we could provide them with a much better collection of content to meet their needs.”
Staff at Brown’s library had long thought that although there was plentiful material on the web concerning conference proceedings, there was an opportunity for the library to refine the resources it provides, such as monographs, e-books and database subscriptions to provide better support for researchers.
“I could have gone through the biographies of every faculty member to find out the subjects in which they were interested,” Andrew says. “But I wanted a more efficient method. I wanted to see what they were doing now, what they were writing about, and with whom they were collaborating.”
Overleaf as the answer
To facilitate that quest for information, Brown decided to use Overleaf, a Digital Science portfolio company, as its authoring and submissions tool. Overleaf is a cloud-based scientific writing, editing and publishing platform, which was the platform preferred by the department – and as it is LaTeX compatible, it is particularly suited to the sort of content produced by computer science researchers. It has analytical tools, which allow Andrew the sort of insight he wanted into the subject matter produced by the department’s researchers.
If you want to read more, check out the original case study over on the Overleaf blog.